Asus ROG Strix G513QM_G513QM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ROG Strix G513QM_G513QM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G513QM
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 22:55
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 146
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 660
59% 499 Pts
64-Core 1,201
74% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 104C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.16.07
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 102
Parallax 13.6
8% 41.8 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 11
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 819 873 816 824 834 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 999
Write 892
Mixed 875
SusWrite 840
203% 902 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 64.4
208% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 663
436% 524 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 177%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 25.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 29.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 SAM07CA SMS23A550H
Typical ROG Strix G513QM_G513QM Builds (Compare 1,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus ROG Strix G513QM_G513QM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback