Emachines ET1352

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Emachines ET1352 (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines ET1350
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100402
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '21 at 20:40
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29 4,513 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	32% Below average	Memory 51.1 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 80.3 35% 57 Pts	4-Core 76.8 8-Core 77.8 10% 77.3 Pts	64-Core 67.9 4% 67.9 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.8 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 11.2 11% 13.7 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 14.7 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 127 120 130 130 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.8% Below average	Read 217 Write 127 Mixed 109 SusWrite 124 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 15.8 69% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 28.9 DQ Write 93 DQ Mixed 21 28% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 45%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 233GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 88 86 91 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 88.3 Write 86.4 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 85.4 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B2873FH0-CH9 4x1GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 9.7 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 4R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	26%	54	124	76	60	21.6"	1680 1050	HWP280C HP w2216

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET1352 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1352

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	4x
Athlon II X2 215AMD $29Bench 38%, 4,513 samples	2x
Athlon II X3 450AMD $80Bench 44%, 4,468 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x

SSD
SU 800 128GBAdataBench 68%, 245 samples	3x
MZ7TD128HAFV 128GBSamsungBench 45%, 2 samples	2x
SSD 120GBIntensoBench 65%, 3,562 samples	1x

RAM
RMR5030EF68F9W1600 CT25664BA160B.C8FE Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 24%, 3 samples	3x
M391B2873FH0-CH9 4x1GBSamsungBench 43%, 21 samples	2x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 43%, 1,169 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16