Toshiba Satellite C50-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba Satellite C50-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F2
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 03:30
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 116
61% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 176
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 6.8
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.7
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120G 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0111A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 170 57 104 5.9 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 332
Write 127
Mixed 168
SusWrite 81.7
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 7.9
66% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 59.1
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 47
59% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 82%
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV 128GB
97GB free
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 127 127 127 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
Read 323
Write 129
Mixed 131
SusWrite 126
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 15.4
67% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 69.6
DQ Mixed 44.4
48% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
31GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 23 21 23 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 21.3
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 22.2
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.1
218% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C50-C Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C50-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback