Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 04:30
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 157
2-Core 311
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,299
113% 963 Pts
64-Core 1,616
100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 213
Parallax 255
256% 261 fps
MRender 269
Gravity 224
Splatting 181
179% 225 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 204%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1291 1385 1388 1386 1384 1389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,477
Write 1,514
Mixed 1,076
SusWrite 1,371
306% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 70.5
239% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 273
342% 595 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 251%
Great: 255%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB
199GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 667 334 335 336 333 336 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 127%
External USB3.0 DISK03 129,986.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Read 32.4
Write 32.6
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 4.3
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 84%
External USB3.0 DISK04 129,986.5TB
219GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 32.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 34.4
43% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 33.7
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 33.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 100 27" 1280 720 AUS27AF VG278
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback