HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory2.7 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 05:24
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 57.7
37% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 41.9
8-Core 7.7
4% 24.8 Pts
64-Core 70.9
4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36ED) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 211 228 190 230 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 204
Write 163
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 191
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 14.9
52% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 86.7
DQ Write 43.5
DQ Mixed 19.4
27% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
76GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 83 65 78 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 76.5
Write 76.7
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 78.3
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 55%
StoreJet Transcend 160GB
81GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 24.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 25.4
34% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B2873FHS-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B2873FH0-CH9 ID:85 F7 F6456U64F1600G 42GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 3.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 19.5" 1280 720 ACR032C Acer V206HQL
Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $117
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback