HP h8-1360t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h8-1360t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory5.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120702
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '21 at 23:00
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 201
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 506
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21.6
17% 20.5 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 14.3
16% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 15 7.9 102 91 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 152
Write 116
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 65.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
129% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
64GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 89 87 87 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 86
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 23% 35 210 148 60 31.5" 1920 1080 HPN351A HP 32 Display
History: Score 12: 1R 2G 1B | Score 24: 3R 2G 3B
Typical h8-1360t Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1360t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback