Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	30GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 30GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	23 GB free of 30 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101223
Uptime	11.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 158 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 387 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 162 Parallax 182 135% 170 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 145 Splatting 122 120% 151 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 72GB free Firmware: 3MRC SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 59 57 58 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.8% Below average	Read 124 Write 118 Mixed 114 SusWrite 57.8 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 24 80% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 40.7 DQ Mixed 27.3 22% 30.4 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 125%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 93GB free Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 198 152 160 172 118 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21% Poor	Read 38 Write 91.3 Mixed 86 SusWrite 161 22% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 8.2 30% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 3.3 DQ Write 18 DQ Mixed 5.7 6% 9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 165GB free Firmware: BSKF SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 59 57 58 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.5% Poor	Read 110 Write 82.3 Mixed 63 SusWrite 57.8 18% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 9.6 40% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 9.3 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 11.5 9% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 63 78 73 98 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 199 Write 140 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 79.7 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 142GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 66 77 76 99 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 152 Write 146 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 81.6 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 173 176 176 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 129 Write 150 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 170 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 194% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 90%
Lexar SFF-SSD 512GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 388GB free, PID ba12 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 423%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 126 125 124 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 79.8 Write 117 Mixed 91.7 SusWrite 120 145% 102 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 49%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 402GB free, PID ab21 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 83 Write 58.7 Mixed 49 SusWrite 82.3 90% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 30GB 819 User benchmarks, average bench 53% null MHz 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.4% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 10 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 10.5 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	100	34"	1280 720	LEN66A1 LEN G34w-10

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	406x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	218x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	149x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	343x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	331x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16