Asus X200MA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus X200MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X200MA
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '21 at 17:39
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3530 5,111 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 24.3 2-Core 48.8 28% 41.3 Pts	4-Core 97.7 8-Core 95.9 13% 96.8 Pts	64-Core 97.1 6% 97.1 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 15BD) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.7 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 94 116 116 120 164 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.3% Average	Read 195 Write 104 Mixed 132 SusWrite 130 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 20.4 75% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 39.9 DQ Mixed 26.7 22% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR6R-PB 1x4GB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.9 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	12	11	8	60	11.6"	1366 768	CMN1119

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X200MA Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X200MA

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	50x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	25x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	24x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	136x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 196 samples	24x
HMT451S6AFR6A-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 16%, 130 samples	23x
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 24%, 494 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $53

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X200MA

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Asus X200MA

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)