HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	15.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '21 at 02:05
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 75.6 2-Core 143 58% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 176 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B9) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.3% Average	Lighting 52.5 Reflection 65.3 Parallax 50.7 43% 56.2 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 46.3 Splatting 43.1 36% 43.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$78 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 122GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.9 7.4 7.2 7.6 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Emtec X150 240GB 3,577 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 87GB free Firmware: V4.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 7 8.3 9.9 9.7 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 88%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 71 80 83 80 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 114 Write 127 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 80.2 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 5.7 6.7 6 6.4 6.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
USB3.0 250GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 162GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 17.7 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 14.8 16% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 47%
USB 160GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 76GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 13 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 31 Write 18.1 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 12.4 16% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.M16F Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.4% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 12.7 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 7.6 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	23.5"	1280 720	VSCB931 VX2457

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,043x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	971x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	402x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	382x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16