HP 750-175se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 750-175se  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 16:47
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 642
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 49.4
40% 50.7 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 56.4
43% 51.8 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GB
342GB free
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 43 42 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 101%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 327 336 322 314 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 423
Write 404
Mixed 350
SusWrite 319
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 34.4
107% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 240
204% 299 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 121%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
11GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.9 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 12
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 2.1
13% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
88% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 13%
WD easystore 25FA 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 99 99 99 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 98.6
Write 89.8
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 97.6
114% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GRR Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 0420 F4-2133C15-8GRR Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 10% 78 289 195 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR06CC SB270
History: Score 14: 2R 1G 1B | Score 24: 3R 2G 3B
Typical 750-175se Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: HP 750-175se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback