Today's hottest deals

Tsinghua H81M-CT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTsinghua H81M-CT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-CT
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150213
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 02:54
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 195
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 367
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 68 41 67 70 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 436
Write 387
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 115
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 2.7
33% 8.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
22GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 67 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 24
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 66.1
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$42
12GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 26.9
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 67.9
36% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
5GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 15 14 9.6 12 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5.5
Write 6
SusWrite 11.4
11% 7.63 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
WD easystore 25FA 2TB
614GB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 36 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 26.7
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 34.7
39% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 0" 1028 720
Typical H81M-CT Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Tsinghua H81M-CT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback