Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results


Gaming 156% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 159% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z390-P (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	8.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 155 2-Core 273 98% 174 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 1,115 100% 843 Pts	64-Core 1544 96% 1544 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 470.05 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	156% Outstanding	Lighting 232 Reflection 212 Parallax 204 189% 216 fps	MRender 197 Gravity 157 Splatting 138 131% 164 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 156% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 971 720 721 713 705 707 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	282% Outstanding	Read 2553 Write 2,254 Mixed 1,538 SusWrite 756 396% 1,775 MB/s	4K Read 63.3 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 83.6 280% 97.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,195 DQ Write 888 DQ Mixed 1,039 777% 1,040 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 282% Great: 355%
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB 27,018 User benchmarks, average bench 147% 476GB free Firmware: HPS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 884 882 882 884 885 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,364 Write 888 Mixed 824 SusWrite 882 221% 989 MB/s	4K Read 60.6 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 70 260% 93.3 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 816 DQ Mixed 222 270% 457 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 203%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 264GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 124 124 124 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 80 Write 137 Mixed 28 SusWrite 124 67% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.1 378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 213 214 214 210 213 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 156 Mixed 84.6 SusWrite 210 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 106%
Asmt 2115 3TB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 58GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 97 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 168 Write 164 Mixed 108 SusWrite 97.1 99% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 95%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 58GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 39.1 Write 39 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 41.1 52% 38.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 22%
SanDisk Ultra 250GB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 156GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 50 24 18 16 21 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 157 Write 55.1 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 32.7 96% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3.2 202% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMWX16GC3000C15W4 2x16GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 35.5 MC Mixed 26.7 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 39.6 SC Mixed 28.8 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	31.6"	1280 720	ACR0507 EB321HQU

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 18,406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $106

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $253Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	5,517x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	3,193x
Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,812x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	2,112x
RTX 2060Nvidia $291Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,165x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,092x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	748x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	702x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	543x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	674x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	438x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	415x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $682

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16