PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 LE (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130912 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 26 '21 at 12:59 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
80.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 258 238 253 171 143 MB/s
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$33
628GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 90 90 91 92 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 310x |
Core i7-2600Intel $184Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 230x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 216x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 84x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 72x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $635 |