Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 08:59
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 216
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 703
67% 552 Pts
64-Core 809
50% 809 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2068 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 116
Parallax 105
87% 109 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 106
Splatting 103
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 172 149 178 87 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 160
Write 93.3
Mixed 77
SusWrite 138
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 10.7
45% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 10.4
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 13
10% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 29%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
238GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 118
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
341GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 120 113 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 125
Write 105
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 118
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Basic 4TB
2TB free, PID aa14
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 111 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 82.5
Write 104
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 110
128% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 22.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 6R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 13% 99 352 293 120 24" 2048 1152 HAH2400 M238E4K
History: Score 33: 5R 2G 2B | Score 51: 7R 2G 10B | Score 43: 6R 3G 4B
Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback