Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 14:34
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 216
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 689
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2068 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 115
Parallax 104
88% 109 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 106
Splatting 103
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 84 43 58 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 188
Write 85.9
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 98.2
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 8.9
33% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 4.5
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 10.6
8% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
238GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 118 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 117
71% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
341GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 111 118 107 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 125
Write 98
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 109
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 88%
ST4000LM 024-2AN17V 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.4 2 2.5 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 2
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 2.3
3% 2.15 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 28%
Seagate Basic 4TB
2.5TB free, PID aa14
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 60 51 56 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 47
Write 47.5
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 54.1
68% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.2
106% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 22.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 120 24" 1280 720 HAH2400 M238E4K
Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback