Sirona inLab 4 PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSirona inLab 4 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI B150M PRO-VDH (MS-7982)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170213
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 07:08
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 192
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 605
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.1% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 71.8
57% 71.5 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 65.2
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 219 222 218 220 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 389
Write 265
Mixed 264
SusWrite 216
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 35
131% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 141
135% 213 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80%
Great: 91%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 99 65 78 102 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 37.5
Write 142
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 95.8
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 9905598-009.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.9% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 0.7" 1280 720 VIE1818 A2757H
Typical inLab 4 PC Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Sirona inLab 4 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback