Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1842 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200918
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,166
104% 880 Pts
64-Core 2,247
139% 2,247 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.9% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 104
Parallax 95.9
79% 99 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 93.2
76% 93 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper M.2 VPN100 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1185 538 545 538 526 539 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 2,161
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 645
317% 1,405 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 60.6
223% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 348
276% 398 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 186%
Great: 253%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 130 131 130 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 122
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 129
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
385GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 109 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 96
Write 97.1
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 110
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 86%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
786GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 39.2
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 101
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 36.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 34.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM772D 32ML600
Typical GA-B550M DS3H Builds (Compare 7,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback