Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '17 at 13:24
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 156
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 220
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 275-$250
Device(0000 0000) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
9.01% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 5.59
10% 9.15 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 6.65
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 505
Write 411
Mixed 417
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 20.3
115% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 20.5
27% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
43GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 80.1
Mixed 95.6
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.24
80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3V Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback