Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '17 at 08:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2120 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 79
2-Core 114
61% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 169
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 275-$250
Device(0000 0000) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
7.9% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 7.42
Parallax 4.53
9% 7.54 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 5.91
6% 8.04 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.9%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 507
Write 409
Mixed 412
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 20.8
122% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 67.1
69% 117 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
43GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 98.6
Mixed 110
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3V Builds (Compare 1,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback