Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 162 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 306 42% 312 Pts	64-Core 313 19% 313 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA 1223) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.42% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 2.1 0% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1 1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.42% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 116 93 94 135 128 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.9% Below average	Read 236 Write 213 Mixed 180 SusWrite 127 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 12.6 48% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 72.4 DQ Mixed 32.6 40% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564128FH8N0TNSDG Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.7% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	454x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	219x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	147x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $287

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16