TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 207
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 381
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 76%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Gigabyte(1458 21D7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 14.7
13% 15.5 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 13
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 12.1%
 Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0925A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 113 59 72 61 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 511
Write 440
Mixed 427
SusWrite 98.1
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 47.9
164% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 120
124% 201 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 88.3%
 Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
830GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70% Good
Read 139
Write 132
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 104
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 70%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Kingston 99U5401-011.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 36.6%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 6R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 25% 48 70 56 60 21.5" 1920 1080 VSC0F30 VA2261
History: Score 35: 4R 5G 0B | Score 48: 6R 6G 0B
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples466x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples298x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples223x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples303x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples203x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples173x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples139x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples48x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples41x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback