Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 105
2-Core 177
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 386
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Gigabyte(1458 21D7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 13
12% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0925A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 177 87 58 74 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 469
Mixed 425
SusWrite 96.1
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 48.1
165% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 238
193% 268 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
830GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 101 100 102 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 131
Write 139
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 102
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Kingston 99U5401-011.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 11.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC0F30 VA2261
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback