Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 05:53
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 201
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 390
52% 391 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Gigabyte(1458 21D7) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 13
12% 13.8 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0925A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 189 71 57 76 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 511
Write 463
Mixed 430
SusWrite 99.7
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 47.4
162% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 241
194% 268 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
842GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 134 132 132 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 143
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 133
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Kingston 99U5401-011.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 13.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 3R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 35% 34 23 3 60 21.5" 1920 1080 VSC0F30 VA2261
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback