Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FX506II

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FX506II (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506II
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 13:53
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 26,507 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 75.7 1-Core 149 2-Core 294 92% 173 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,048 98% 814 Pts	64-Core 1,387 86% 1,387 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 64 Parallax 25.4 15% 36.1 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 18.2 14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 144 70 101 92 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 972 Write 929 Mixed 831 SusWrite 116 159% 712 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 191 4K Mixed 66.9 250% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 922 DQ Mixed 157 251% 458 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 185%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 113GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 327 320 350 320 321 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 458 Mixed 447 SusWrite 346 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 60.3 204% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 278 209% 280 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 27.1 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 33.3 SC Mixed 21.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 3R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	29%	38	312	234	144	15.5"	1920 1080	NCP004D

History: Score 16: 1R 3G 2B | Score 33: 3R 5G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FX506II Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FX506II

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	84x
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	65x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	89x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	60x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	35x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	35x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	35x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	23x
16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 1x16GBMicronBench 46%, 6,167 samples	22x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16