Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 12:53
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 229
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 876
80% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Asus(1043 04E4) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.7% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 122
Parallax 162
90% 131 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 111
Splatting 81.5
78% 97.4 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 68 89 63 71 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 340
Write 200
Mixed 193
SusWrite 82.8
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 20.9
86% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 107
94% 149 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 76%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33
53GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 4 146 125 131 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 257
Write 178
Mixed 209
SusWrite 131
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 11.6
42% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 80.4
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 37.6
34% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 55%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
297GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 480 478 481 478 582 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,286
Write 498
Mixed 883
SusWrite 614
182% 820 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 72.3
239% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 433
446% 730 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 202%
Great: 311%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
458GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 91.9
Write 91.4
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 88
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
140GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 63.7
Write 40
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 88.5
42% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 35.8
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 7 5 144 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3230 AG323QWS4R4
Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback