TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 05:51
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 139
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 744
76% 614 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 90%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3009 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.1% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 90
Parallax 54.6
46% 67 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 49.8
44% 54.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 45.1%
 Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 217 219 219 219 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,460
Write 839
Mixed 940
SusWrite 257
194% 874 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 68.1
238% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 579
471% 665 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 179%
 Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
847GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 131 131 131 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 79
Write 79.9
Mixed 64
SusWrite 128
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 59.5%
 Great: 71%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB
2GB free, PID 1653
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 5.7 4 7.2 6.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 14.3
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 5.2
17% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.86%
 Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
6GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9.8 10 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 14
Write 10.2
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 10.1
15% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.48%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Transcend JM3200HSG-8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.6
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 75.6%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples2,425x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples325x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples27x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples1,535x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples1,241x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples1x
SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples1,051x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples397x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples355x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples532x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples489x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples368x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback