ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '21 at 13:42
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 89.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 277 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 721 76% 611 Pts	64-Core 721 45% 721 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3009 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.5% Average	Lighting 55.4 Reflection 88.1 Parallax 53.1 45% 65.5 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 49.5 Splatting 48.8 43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB 10,140 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 216 218 217 220 218 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,469 Write 810 Mixed 806 SusWrite 252 184% 834 MB/s	4K Read 48.8 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 66.3 237% 87.6 MB/s	DQ Read 684 DQ Write 746 DQ Mixed 574 471% 668 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 848GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 131 131 130 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 77.3 Write 86.6 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 127 64% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 71%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1653 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.8 5.7 7.6 6.2 6.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	6.58% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 14.3 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 5.9 17% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.3 78% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.58% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 6GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 11 10 11 11 8.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	6.53% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 8.7 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 9.8 14% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Transcend JM3200HSG-8G 16GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 22 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 38.6 SC Mixed 26.5 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	2,425x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	325x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	27x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	1,535x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	1,241x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	1,051x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	397x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	355x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	532x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	489x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	368x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback