TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 256
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 730
76% 609 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 90.3%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 50.5
42% 61.1 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 46.6
Splatting 46.1
41% 51 fps
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 41.7%
 Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 218 218 219 218 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 855
Mixed 878
SusWrite 258
191% 864 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 68.9
241% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 580
473% 669 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 181%
 Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
877GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 127 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 126
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 68.9%
 Great: 71%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB
2GB free, PID 1653
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.8 5.2 7.4 7 7.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 12.5
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 6.2
16% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.03%
 Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
6GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 9.7 10 11 7.1 9.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 6.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 8.9
11% 8.92 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.66%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Transcend JM3200HSG-8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 20.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 20.3
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 74.1%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples2,417x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples325x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples27x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples1,531x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples1,237x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples1x
SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples1,048x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples396x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples354x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples532x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples489x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples366x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback