TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 14:16
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 231
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 614
67% 532 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 86.1%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 7.5
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.4
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.71%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 266 271 272 272 268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 443
Mixed 355
SusWrite 282
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 48.4
174% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 233
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 118%
Sandisk U100 64GB
10GB free
Firmware: CS.10.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 211
Mixed 124
55% 254 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 11.5
46% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 34.3
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 15.7
14% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 46%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 194 195 195 194 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 154
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 194
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0215 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 2400, 1600, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 61%
 Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples1,630x
Core i5-4690KIntel  $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples451x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples225x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples407x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples232x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples158x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples108x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples103x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples79x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples110x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples107x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples91x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback