Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-6110 APU R2 Graphics 1,030 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 43.4 1-Core 17 2-Core 40.3 23% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 76.2 8-Core 76.1 10% 76.1 Pts	64-Core 64.3 4% 64.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 9852) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 4.3 1% 3.13 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3.3 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 3.7 2.4 14 14 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 316 Write 294 Mixed 215 SusWrite 52.5 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 8.4 38% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 25.4 34% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD380D81-1600D 1x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
E2-6110 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 29%, 1,030 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 1,710 samples	1x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
JAJS600M256C 256GBBench 69%, 1,795 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6AFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 45%, 157 samples	1x
Value DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 30%, 2,811 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16