Lenovo 82JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory15.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 23:36
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 297
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 944
90% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,412
87% 1,412 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3A80) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.40.28.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 130
Parallax 35.4
21% 63.9 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 22.6
18% 22 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1101 1TB
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1605 1063 771 1035 1032 1002 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,997
Write 2,117
Mixed 1,817
SusWrite 1,085
394% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 69.1
234% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,152
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 981
730% 976 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 262%
Great: 308%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
162GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 97 89 105 100 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,534
Write 1,490
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 281
245% 1,098 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 75
256% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 946
DQ Mixed 273
358% 635 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 194%
Great: 295%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00WN9B0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 139 141 141 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 141
Write 142
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 140
174% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA EXT 1TB
848GB free, PID 0d00
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 101
112% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 44%
M4-CT512 M4SSD2 512GB
467GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 139 141 141 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 380
Write 114
Mixed 265
SusWrite 141
272% 225 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 16.8
1,525% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Mixed 17.5
984% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 312%
Hitachi HDP725040GLA360 400GB
203GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 72
Write 71.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 71.9
85% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C20 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 34
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 32.1
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JQ Builds (Compare 3,684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback