Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '17 at 21:41
Run Duration721 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 833
82% 671 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 29.7
20% 28.8 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 34.1
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
376GB free
Firmware: P1003B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 500
Write 415
Mixed 437
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 19.1
104% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 13.9
75% 168 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87%
Great: 105%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 172
Write 177
Mixed 601
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 27.3
157% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 433
DQ Mixed 26.7
82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 144%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
349GB free
Firmware: P1003B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 504
Write 385
Mixed 454
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 26.9
114% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 13.4
76% 171 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 105%
Seagate 600 480GB-$199
87GB free
Firmware: C675 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 444
Mixed 450
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 21.3
122% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 83
130% 248 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 104%
Seagate 600 480GB-$199
65GB free
Firmware: C675 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 447
Mixed 464
105% 473 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 19.7
122% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 19.4
100% 226 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 104%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
40GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 485
Write 267
Mixed 346
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 4.98
97% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 5.19
23% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 74%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
37GB free
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 514
Write 257
Mixed 344
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 10.7
107% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 8.88
62% 141 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 81%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
930GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 158
Write 109
Mixed 116
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.24
107% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
441GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 140
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.22
110% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 107%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
338GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 79.5
Write 78.8
Mixed 103
66% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
361GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 87.8
Mixed 87.1
69% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.34
115% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
952GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 96.6
149% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.23
90% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 67%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
337GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 108
141% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.36
71% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 47%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
71GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 79
Mixed 63.3
93% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.16
64% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 35%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
48GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 98.5
Mixed 77.2
110% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.44
62% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 51%
Crucial_ CT960M500SSD1 960GB
34GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
343% Outstanding
Read 383
Write 394
Mixed 381
500% 386 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 14.3
2,747% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 14.2
3,214% 38 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 343%
Great: 343%
M4-CT512 M4SSD2 512GB
24GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 261
Mixed 313
395% 324 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 8.64
2,501% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 8.58
2,920% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 312%
Great: 312%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 12.4
Write 4.34
Mixed 6.26
8% 7.67 MB/s
4K Read 6.82
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
26% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 40.7
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $686
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback