HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory40.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 05:42
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 171
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 512
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,197
74% 1,197 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 116
Parallax 101
86% 107 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 103
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 512GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 516 500 486 489 491 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 566
Write 486
Mixed 400
SusWrite 503
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 26.9
80% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 245
159% 177 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 122%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
2GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.5
Write 99.8
Mixed 52.8
101% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 86%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
477GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 115 120 119 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 118
119% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 105
Write 100
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 14.7
83% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 67%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
324GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 53.5
76% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback