PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T1600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T1600 (all builds) |
Memory | 29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120221 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 13 '21 at 15:34 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8600) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 405 448 454 450 357 MB/s
|
99.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 51 25 32 20 45 MB/s
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CH9 M378B1G73BH0-CH9 M378B1G73BH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G4D1 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
48%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 194x |
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples | 160x |
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples | 96x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 51x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 46x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |