Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 20:03
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 831
85% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0519) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 95.1
58% 77.3 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 75
Splatting 48.6
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 536 586 612 572 502 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,515
Write 2,101
Mixed 1,582
SusWrite 618
380% 1,704 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 85.7
287% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 930
DQ Mixed 909
731% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 277%
Great: 340%
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
40GB free
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 312 312 312 299 312 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 311
Mixed 286
SusWrite 310
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 40
143% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 208
191% 293 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 98%
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
97GB free
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 211 211 211 211 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 492
Write 212
Mixed 237
SusWrite 211
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 34.1
126% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 178
153% 227 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
309GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 136 133 137 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 141
Write 145
Mixed 100
SusWrite 136
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.6 6 6.2 6.9 6.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 75.6
Write 6.7
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 7.1
25% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
65% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 38.6
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $732
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback