bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DX79SR
Memory	18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120424
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '21 at 19:19
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 96.9 2-Core 190 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 580 59% 479 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 46.8 Parallax 32.2 29% 38.3 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 40.1 Splatting 28.8 28% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 768GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 247 197 234 271 236 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 477 Write 259 Mixed 259 SusWrite 240 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 33.3 120% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 287 206% 273 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 371GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 114 112 112 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 156 Write 116 Mixed 93.9 SusWrite 112 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB 2,655 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 468GB free, PID a013 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 21 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 26.2 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x434D5A33324758334D3458313630304331 4x8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 29.4 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,033x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,576x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	938x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	518x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	377x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16