bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SR
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 19:11
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 583
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 32.2
29% 38.2 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 29
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 425 427 439 235 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 451
Mixed 335
SusWrite 351
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 33.6
120% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 293
239% 341 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
371GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 118 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 120
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
468GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 26.2
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D5A33324758334D3458313630304331 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 29.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback