Acer Nitro AN515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Stonic_RNS
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '21 at 22:54
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 60.1
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 187
51% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 806
74% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,177
73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1447) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 61.9
49% 70.5 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 51.3
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 403 421 427 431 430 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1,529
Mixed 1,243
SusWrite 475
261% 1161 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 41
139% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 992
692% 865 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 163%
Great: 217%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
864GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1325 763 795 829 821 825 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1,592
Mixed 1,171
SusWrite 893
278% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 43.4
140% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 945
702% 931 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 190%
Great: 276%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
830GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 100 99 99 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 97.4
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 99
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-44 Builds (Compare 1,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback