Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '21 at 12:14
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 146 2-Core 292 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 595 8-Core 1,123 102% 859 Pts	64-Core 1,147 71% 1,147 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen02sm20ar256itnvme 256GB 256GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,543 Write 1,003 Mixed 908 254% 1,152 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 26.8 154% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 772 DQ Write 919 DQ Mixed 466 457% 719 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 189%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 459GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 172 171 172 171 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 160 Mixed 96.3 SusWrite 171 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
KLEVV KD48GU88A-26N1600 2x8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 27.3 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 37.4 SC Mixed 27.5 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 57.4 70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	291x
RTX 2060Nvidia $216Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	252x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	209x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	152x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	138x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	89x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	135x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $562