Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F
Memory	120.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150522
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '17 at 07:42
Run Duration	327 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 192 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 707 63% 531 Pts	64-Core 1,396 86% 1,396 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 115 Parallax 99 93% 109 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 96.5 Splatting 98.9 80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 651GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2809 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 812 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 620 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7303787558	79.8% Very good	Read 494 Write 407 Mixed 340 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 21.1 91% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 68.2 82% 141 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 410GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4884 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1432 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1076 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16218110761	78.6% Very good	Read 494 Write 406 Mixed 276 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 21.4 91% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 70.6 74% 122 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5199 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1840 (B1) Unknown 98 98 62 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1468 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13428962720	71.8% Very good	Read 376 Write 378 Mixed 321 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 18.5 84% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 45.8 75% 145 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 116%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 109867432 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1477 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11229618 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5745 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1734 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 56 521666590 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1223 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10758 (C2) HDA temperature 30 44 55834574878 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 12339441046648 (F1) Unknown 100 253 31654424780 (F2) Unknown 100 253 310632153495	74.3% Very good	Read 105 Write 153 Mixed 125 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 5.36 4K Mixed 0.69 206% 2.26 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 108%
WD Re 2TB-$35 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01D02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7658 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1981 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7689 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1977 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1880 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 100 (C2) HDA temperature 116 95 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	73.8% Very good	Read 134 Write 123 Mixed 66.6 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.22 4K Write 2.78 4K Mixed 0.46 153% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 83%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 6.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 103 Write 162 Mixed 72.3 148% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.35 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 0.67 427% 4.58 MB/s	DQ Read 1.59 DQ Write 7.57 DQ Mixed 0.73 288% 3.29 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 92%
WDC WD50 01F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 175 Write 201 Mixed 133 218% 170 MB/s	4K Read 4.35 4K Write 2.99 4K Mixed 0.22 126% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 72%
WDC WD40 00F9YZ-09N20L1 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 129 Write 132 Mixed 112 159% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.61 4K Mixed 0.32 102% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 600GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 160 Write 119 Mixed 93.5 149% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.21 72% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A Sem... 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 30 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 7.6 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v21stBench 58%, 398 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	1x
M500 480GBCrucial $81Bench 83%, 9,168 samples	1x
Raid 0 Volume 912GBIntelBench 114%, 287 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	3x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 29 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0-C M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K7... 128GBSamsungBench 87%, 9 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16