Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F
Memory	111.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150522
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '17 at 15:50
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 189 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 698 62% 527 Pts	64-Core 1,784 110% 1,784 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Lighting 115 Reflection 114 Parallax 98 94% 109 fps	MRender 93.5 Gravity 97.9 Splatting 98.9 80% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 732GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2663 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 755 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 615 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6485543762	79.7% Very good	Read 494 Write 407 Mixed 366 94% 422 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 20.7 91% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 66.2 81% 140 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 452GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4738 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1375 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1072 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16067458302	79.8% Very good	Read 492 Write 406 Mixed 383 95% 427 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 22.6 93% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 76 81% 135 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5067 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1783 (B1) Unknown 98 98 60 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 51 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1436 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12967024278	71.1% Very good	Read 376 Write 386 Mixed 342 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 18.3 82% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 56.6 75% 137 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 116%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 69399568 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1446 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 10805341 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5606 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1677 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 538509344 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1222 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10588 (C2) HDA temperature 32 44 55834574880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 66327179957252 (F1) Unknown 100 253 31490449736 (F2) Unknown 100 253 305791289965	77.8% Very good	Read 115 Write 155 Mixed 103 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 5.39 4K Mixed 0.62 197% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 108%
WD Re 2TB-$35 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01D02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7658 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1950 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7544 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1946 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1874 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 75 (C2) HDA temperature 113 95 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	73.7% Very good	Read 136 Write 121 Mixed 116 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 3.16 4K Mixed 0.5 146% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 83%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 6.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 98.5 Write 163 Mixed 82.3 153% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 0.69 435% 4.63 MB/s	DQ Read 1.55 DQ Write 12.8 DQ Mixed 0.65 463% 5 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 92%
WDC WD50 01F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 165 Write 207 Mixed 134 219% 169 MB/s	4K Read 4.11 4K Write 2.74 4K Mixed 0.3 119% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 72%
WDC WD40 00F9YZ-09N20L1 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 137 Write 130 Mixed 117 162% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 3.28 4K Mixed 0.31 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 600GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 157 Write 116 Mixed 95.5 148% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.21 71% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A Sem... 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.2% Excellent	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 30 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.4 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v21stBench 58%, 398 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	1x
M500 480GBCrucial $81Bench 83%, 9,168 samples	1x
Raid 0 Volume 912GBIntelBench 114%, 287 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	3x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 29 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0-C M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K7... 128GBSamsungBench 87%, 9 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16