Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F
Memory119.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '17 at 12:26
Run Duration355 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 153
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 614
54% 461 Pts
64-Core 1,566
97% 1,566 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 114
Parallax 99.5
79% 104 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 98.2
80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
699GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 261
Write 205
Mixed 134
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 23.3
82% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 62.5
68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
462GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.4% Above average
Read 263
Write 204
Mixed 130
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 22.4
82% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 63
68% 114 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 490
Write 471
Mixed 361
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 19
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 63.3
76% 131 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79%
Great: 116%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 117
Write 153
Mixed 96.9
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 5.34
4K Mixed 0.86
220% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 108%
WD Re 2TB-$35
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01D02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 123
Write 125
Mixed 11.7
62% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 2.98
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
WDC WD50 01F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 26.5
34% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.47
4K Write 2.83
4K Mixed 0.28
119% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 72%
WDC WD40 00F9YZ-09N20L1 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 24.1
33% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.36
100% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
600GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 25.5
Mixed 18.7
30% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.19
69% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A Sem... 128GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 29.9
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback