HP ProBook 640 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP ProBook 640 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 856D
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 13:11
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 210
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 388
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 856D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 917
Write 851
Mixed 950
203% 906 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 65.2
217% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 618
481% 670 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 213%
USB30 320GB
266GB free
Firmware: 0405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 83 86 87 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 73.9
Write 75.6
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 83.8
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 9905700-050.A00G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 640 G5 Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 640 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback