Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 12:43
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 340
109% 202 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,302
116% 982 Pts
64-Core 2,992
185% 2,992 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 65.9
56% 68.7 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 64
54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 250GB-$90
157GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 452 452 452 403 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 446
Mixed 361
SusWrite 420
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 44.6
154% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 176
140% 195 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 270 273 273 272 272 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,210
Write 1,148
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 301
264% 1,197 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 97.4
333% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 647
555% 808 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 250%
Great: 244%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
759GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1390 68 24 43 48 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,330
Write 1,617
Mixed 706
SusWrite 266
219% 980 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 73.9
225% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 206
200% 333 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 158%
Great: 276%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
644GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 442 442 443 444 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 428
Mixed 423
SusWrite 440
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 53.1
175% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 186
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
19GB free
Firmware: 5.05A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 182 190 194 200 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 306
Write 245
Mixed 256
SusWrite 195
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 42.7
153% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 142
121% 178 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 122 128 130 132 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 129
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 3TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 127 131 133 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 130
66% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 62.5
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 44.5
144% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 42
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 134%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback