| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GF75 Thin 10UEK |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-17F5 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210121 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 03 '21 at 05:14 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
83% 145 Pts
|
63% 516 Pts
|
46% 736 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6647
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.2%
Above average
|
57% 73.3 fps
|
52% 64.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.1%
Good
|
70% 24.3 GB/s
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
59% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-17F5 Builds (Compare 1,069 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-17F5
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples | 964x |
| Core i5-10500HIntelBench 80%, 12,921 samples | 72x |
| Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples | 33x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples | 536x |
| UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples | 529x |
| UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |