Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 175 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 339 45% 339 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 2000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 128GB SSD 128GB 1,066 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 223 204 97 107 107 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.1% Average	Read 248 Write 225 Mixed 216 SusWrite 160 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 9.6 72% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 90.6 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 17.1 45% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 83%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 930GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 146 147 147 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 150 Write 135 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 146 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	129x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	33x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x
99U5471-002.A01LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 45%, 627 samples	13x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	13x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $202