TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Punch LDT-703-1039

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPunch LDT-703-1039  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte A320M-H-CF
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 14:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 201
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 588
58% 475 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 70.3%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.36
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 28.3
17% 21.3 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 23
Splatting 14
13% 16 fps
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 15.6%
 Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 443 443 460 383 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 414
Mixed 313
SusWrite 424
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 37.3
132% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 279
232% 333 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 133%
PNY CS900 480GB-$35
366GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 120 72 71 68 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 427
Write 360
Mixed 301
SusWrite 126
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 32
116% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 181
160% 238 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 72.5%
 Great: 102%
Crucial_ CT256MX100SSD1 256GB
20GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.7 6.5 5.7 6.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Read 5
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 6.4
7% 5.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.09%
 Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE Adata 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 25.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 76.6%
 Great: 99%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical LDT-703-1039 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Punch LDT-703-1039

CPU
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD  $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples2x
GPU
RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 15%, 44,235 samples1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples1x
SSD
SU650 480GBAdata  $89Bench 69%, 17,796 samples1x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples1x
RAM
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE Adata 16GBUnknownBench 80%, 20 samples1x
CT16G4DFD824A.M16FJ Adata 24GBUnknownBench 63%, 1 sample1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback