TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BNi7HG4-950
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 08:12
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 178
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 532
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 71.1%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
Gigabyte(1458 D003) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 34.6
28% 35.7 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 34.4
Splatting 30
25% 30.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 26.6%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1239 1203 1187 1201 1192 1196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,454
Mixed 727
SusWrite 1,203
285% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 63
240% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 866
672% 921 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑
This bench: 257%
 Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
593GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 437 440 446 441 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 441
Mixed 360
SusWrite 436
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 45.7
158% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 330
249% 334 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 124%
ST4000VN 000-1H4168 2TB
3TB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 42 43 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 36.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 41.8
50% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 19.8%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 28.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 87.2%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-MKHM17P-00 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples11x
GPU
GeForce GTX 950NvidiaBench 26%, 59 samples11x
SSD
SKC2500M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 260%, 4,181 samples7x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung  $175Bench 105%, 25,365 samples2x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples1x
RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 87%, 649 samples10x
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GBCrucialBench 73%, 680 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback