Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BNi7HG4-950
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '21 at 08:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 540
54% 440 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
Gigabyte(1458 D003) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 34.2
28% 35 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 33
Splatting 28.7
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1263 1202 1195 1195 1197 1185 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,692
Write 1,388
Mixed 642
SusWrite 1,206
275% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 63.7
223% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 868
672% 920 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 252%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
593GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 431 438 444 441 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 424
Mixed 364
SusWrite 434
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 45.7
157% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 331
248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
903GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 36.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 41.8
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.3
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 24.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MKHM17P-00 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MKHM17P-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback