Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 18 '17 at 10:54
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 81.5
43% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 140
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B 0851) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 9.84
11% 11.8 fps
MRender 9.81
Gravity 9.33
Splatting 16.7
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 243
Write 177
Mixed 165
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 23.3
100% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 22.4
27% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 119%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 119
Write 105
Mixed 74.9
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.16
92% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 88%
WD WD15EADS-00R6B0 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
Read 114
Write 117
Mixed 65.9
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.26
107% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
393GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 65.4
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.22
77% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 72.1
Mixed 25.3
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.29
87% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback